The document discusses the concept of owning or enclosing a language. It argues that if someone could own the English language, it would severely limit free speech and communication. The architecture used to implement currencies inherently leads to enclosure, concentrating power and wealth. Overall, the document cautions against allowing ownership of languages or architectures like currencies that can enable enclosure.

1. What does unencloseable mean?

2. First, consider what would happen if
someone owned the English language.

3. There would be no such
thing as free speech,

4. and communication would be
severely impaired.

5. Using currencies to map
flows is a linguistic act
map

6. similar to writing.
a b c d e f g....

7. a b c d e f g....
language
language
We write using a
language

8. a b c d e f g....
language
language
that isn’t owned
by anyone.

9. a b c d e f g....
language
lanuage
But what if someone
could charge

10. a b c d e f g....
language
for the use of
English?

11. a b c d e f g....
language
The power to
communicate

12. a b c d e f g....
language
would be highly
concentrated.

13. map
architecture
The architecture we use to
implement currencies

14. map
architecture
has enclosure built in.

15. map
architecture
So power and wealth

16. map
architecture
become highly
concentrated.

17. architecture